The holy Quran is an unchallengeable work with a wonderful structure known as an outstanding literature works. On this basis, it is free from any failure of the kind common in speech like middle and bad pleonasm called in rhetoric blameworthy pleonasm. Yet, in spite of the fact, at a superficial view it seems to be some stances of such failure in Quranic verses and phrases though only with regard to frequency of meaning not phrases. The paper has intended to study such cases of the failure. As is understood, on commentators` views, semantical place of this group of non-verbal frequencies have been explained and reader is led to the point that one may not find any case of pleonasm and regarding their situation exactly, each has been placed in its own place and the frequencies are of such rhetoric effect as explanation, multiplication and exaggeration that are counted among literature techniques and cause speech to seem attractive.