%0 Journal Article %A Harati, Mohammadjavad %A Moaddab, Sayyed Reza %T A comparative study of interpretative methods in conciliating purity and wrong of the prophet Dawood %J Scientific Journal Commentary Studies %V 3 %N 9 %U http://tafsir.maaref.ac.ir/article-1-1605-en.html %R %D 2012 %K Comparative commentary, interpretative method, prophets` purity, dawood`s wrong, %X Commentator`s interpretative methods is known as one origin for Shiite and Sunni difference in Quran commentaries. Commentators, when interpreting the verses 22-26 of chapter Suad, differ in conciliating prophet Dawood`s purity and wrong. Surveying Shiite and Sunni`s commentary methods comparatively, the paper has intended to study the origins of commentator`s differences. To do so, some Shiite and Sunni`s commentaries including Shiite commentaries Al-Tebyan, Noor al-Thaqalayn and Al-Mizan and Sunni`s Jami al-Bayan, Mafatih al-Ghaib, Ruh al-Ma'ani and Al-Munir have been studied with regard to the subject. It has been proved that Al-Mizan, taking the method of Quran to Quran commentary and using reasonable and theological proofs and traditions as supporter, has presented the solution best. %> http://tafsir.maaref.ac.ir/article-1-1605-en.pdf %P 57-80 %& 57 %! %9 Research %L A-10-1-168 %+ Buali Sina University %G eng %@ 2228-7256 %[ 2012