|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 4 results for Human Creation
Alireza Noubari, Ali Nasiri,
Volume 2, Issue 7 (12-2011)
Abstract
In different verses of holey Quran, natural aspect of human creation has been described by such words as clay, dust, water, despised fluid, gushing fluid, drop of seed and clot. Some relying on the variety of the words have claimed a disagreement between science and Quran. This paper has intended to answer the claim with studying exegetical views under the related verses with an emphasis on the verses 5-7 of At-Tariq. This false claim is based upon unfamiliarity with the why of Quran revelation and misleading statements of some commentator.
Mohamadhosein `alemi, Saeidh Kazemtouri,
Volume 8, Issue 31 (10-2017)
Abstract
Human creation and life is overlapped with mysteries and secrets. Human falling down has been discussed by commentators and mystics; they proposed the question if the problem refers to a real happening or it is symbolic. As it seems, the best way for understanding the problem, with regard to human ability, lies in referring to the holy Quran. Attributing incorrect and arbitrary views to and imposing irrational thoughts and presuppositions on the Quran is contrary to the judgment of reason. As is viewed in the paper, as long as there is not any reason against formal meaning of the verse, it is necessary to rely on formal meaning and to avoid any other meaning. On this basis, it may be stated that the best comment in the field is based on human preparation for earthly life and one, considering this intention, therefore, would not find anything called sin.
Ali Karbalaei Pazouki, Qudsiya Ali Awsat,
Volume 11, Issue 42 (6-2020)
Abstract
The verses 5 to 7 of chapter al-Tariq state the quality of human creation. Differences on the literal meaning and reality of "loins" and "breast-bones" have led to the differences of opinion among commentators on how to interpret these verses. Thus, some have speculated that these verses have ambiguity and conceptual similarity. The present study seeks to understand the true meaning of "loins" and "breast-bones, the role of men and women in the formation of the fetus and the relationship between science and the Qur'an in this regard. Most commentators and translators have attributed " loins" to the backs of men and "breast-bones" to women's chest bones, and the "effusing fluid" to men. This has raised doubts about the conflict between science and the Qur'an in the formation of the fetus in humans. The results of this study indicate that the meaning of "الصلب" is back and the bones of the back and the meaning of "الترائب" is chest and front bones of the breast. In conclusion, the phrase "between the loins and the breast-bones" implies the whole body and both man and women contribute in the formation of the fetus. They have an active and accepting role, which is conceptually compatible with the findings of modern medical sciences.
Farzaneh Rouhani Mashhadi,
Volume 13, Issue 49 (3-2022)
Abstract
On compatibility or incompatibility of the Qur'an with evolutionism, numerous studies are found. They, however, lack methodological properties, comprehensiveness with regard to the related verses as well as the accuracy This study focuses on the verses of the origin and stages of human creation with a comprehensive look at all related verses and its classification. After extracting the stages of creation and inferring the logical gudgment of these stages from the verses, the current readings of these stages have become clear by analyzing and evaluating the content and regarding the context of Quranic verses. It is a triple reading. Also, the lack attention of researchers to the dual style of the Holy Quran in describing world events, which sometimes has a real expression from a natural-moral point of view and sometimes is accompanied by a symbolic expression from a divine point of view, has led to the reading of extraordinary creation of man. Finally, the analysis of the context of Surah Sajdah, which is a combination of both perspectives, shows that only the reading of the genesis of the evolutionary type is possible, and the reading of the genesis of the extraordinary creation is not compatible with the logical order mentioned in this context.
|
|
