|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 3 results for Difficult Verses
Mohammad Sadeq Heydari, Seyyed Ali Akbar Rabi' Nataj,
Volume 4, Issue 14 (9-2013)
Abstract
One of the outstanding works about allegorical and difficult Quranic verses is 'Mutashabih ul-Quran wa Al-mukhtalif Fih' by Mohammad Ibn Ali Ibn Shahr Ashub Mazandarani. In this book, he has analyzed the Quranic allegorical verses in distinct topics and the domain of his discussions revolve around various topics such as belief principles, religious commandments, and Quranic sciences. He sees allegorical verses from three viewpoints including: having dispute in religious affairs, contradictory verses, and those verses from which two or several meanings could be received and they need to be understood on the more correct meaning. Relying on the mentioned book, the paper attempts to investigate Ibn Shahr Ashub's commentary of the allegorical and difficult verses. According to the findings of the study, one could find out that he has corrected the available suspicions and deviations related to this topic and has eliminated the ambiguities of these verses by using various methods and scholarly orientation.
Ali Pirhadi, Maryam Rastgar, Saleh Hasanzade,
Volume 6, Issue 21 (4-2015)
Abstract
The principle of Divine grace, the idea of believers` non entrance into the Hell and the reason why of creating the Garden and the Hell for people of happiness and people of sin respectively, have put the verse 71 of Maryam among difficult verses. Commentators have sought very much to oppose any idea of disagreement with regard to other verses and reasons and in this way various views have been presented. Lack of a publicly accepted conclusion is a sign for not the problem not to be solved. Three approaches may be found in the commentary of the verse: in one the entrance has been taken to mean entering into, in another to mean dominance and the third is an ethical usage. Contrary to the most commentators, Allameh Tabtaba`I has paid a special attention to the problem. The paper, studying comprehensively and critically different commentaries, has viewed Allameh`s solution as the right one.
Mohamadali Rezaiee Esfahani, Ehteram Rostami,
Volume 8, Issue 31 (10-2017)
Abstract
First verses of the chapter Abasa are known among difficult verses in the Quran. These verses carry God`s rebuke of somebody who had acted badly addressing a blind man. On the question that who was the rebuked two cases have been mentioned; some viewed the man to be Prophet and some others to be an amavi man. The former being well-known for commentators, particularly for Sunni commentators. On the view, there must have been a case of Prophet`s leaving an unnecessary but preferred action. If not, Gods rebuke to Prophet would be meaningless; since God is pure from meaningless action. This view may not be agreed with, because Prophet`s dignity disagrees with it. Of course, no commentator view such a rebuke in response to sin. Because Prophet has been known pure of every sin for them. The latter view has been taken from the Prophet`s household and mentioned by Shiites against the former. The paper has studied the views.
|
|
