|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 3 results for Kalbasi
Mohammadreza Haj Esmaeili, Amir Ahmadnejad, Zahra Kalbasi,
Volume 6, Issue 21 (Spring 2015)
Abstract
Difference on reference of the pronoun in ansahu, forgot him in the verse 42 of R`ad has turned it to one challengeable verse in the field of commentary and theology. In traditional commentary relying on a great number of traditions, Yusuf a. has been taken as the reference of the mentioned phrase and his demand has been introduced to be a wrong action being a cause for his forgetting God`s remembrance. Some of commentators have known the reference the man in prison with Yusuf who affected by Satan forgot Yusuf remembrance before the king. The paper, weakening the validity of traditions in the field in both sides of matter and line of transition, reviewing different views, and relying on the context of verses and the Quranic manner of mentioning messengers` cases of errors being followed by their penitence, has viewed the reference to be the man in prison with Yusuf and, therefore, the prophet has known pure of forgetting.
Amir Ahmadnegad, Zahra Kalbasi,
Volume 8, Issue 29 (Spring 2017)
Abstract
As is understood by the verses dealing with the Prophet`s time of mission at Mecca and historical clear signs, people of the Book lived in Mecca in a continuous interaction with the Prophet and Muslims. An interaction begun with Muslim`s glorifying people of the Book, answering their questions and agreeing with their authority in knowledge of the history of the past. Yet, it has referred to factions of people of the Book and their disagreements in understanding Torah and criticized a group with reproachful words. A critique being gradually increased when the two theist poles split up with one another and, following it, the verses of glorification decreased to such an extent that in the last part of revelation that a place for a quarrel between the Muslim and the people of the Book was made ready, Prophet`s community were ordered to avoid quarreling their theist enemies. One, therefore, may say that interactions between two poles of theism was positive during all time of Prophet`s mission in Mecca and as begun with glorifying believers of the people of the Book and ended with an order to Muslim to discuss them in the best way and emphasize what common with them.
Zahra Kalbasi, Amir Ahmadnejad,
Volume 9, Issue 35 (autumn 2018)
Abstract
The chapter of Ankabut as understood by the context of its most verses is Meccan, though the space in which its primary verses revealed and some intertextual signs like reference to the problem of nifaq have led some commentators to view its 1-10 verses as revealed in Medina and its eighth in the first year of bi`that in Mecca. On this basis, one may not consider the chapter as revealed continuously and it has revealed gradually during a time extended from the beginning of bi`that to 13 years after the Prophet`s hijrah. While sha`ni nuzul of the verse eighth has been an extension and mentioned under the other three verses also. In addition, the disagreement of the causes of revelation under the first ten verses with an attitude of the current nifaq in Mecca during that time opposes the view of the verses` being revealed in Medina. As another reasoning, regarding the purpose of the chapter as exiting the Muslims to resist against the difficulties and paying attention to the time, when Muslims were to leave Mecca and go to Medina, in which the chapter revealed, the connection of the first ten verses of the chapter to the others becomes clear. Therefore, all the verses of the chapter have revealed in late in the age of Mecca and Muslim`s migration to Medina may be taken as an important extension of divine examination toward them. On the basis, by munafiqan is meant those Meccan Muslims who did not follow the Prophet and remained in Mecca.
|
|
