A comparative study of interpretative methods in conciliating purity and wrong of the prophet Dawood
|
Mohammadjavad Harati * 1, Sayyed Reza Moaddab2 |
1- Buali Sina University , mjharaty@yahoo.com 2- Qom University |
|
Abstract: (2084 Views) |
Commentator`s interpretative methods is known as one origin for Shiite and Sunni difference in Quran commentaries. Commentators, when interpreting the verses 22-26 of chapter Suad, differ in conciliating prophet Dawood`s purity and wrong. Surveying Shiite and Sunni`s commentary methods comparatively, the paper has intended to study the origins of commentator`s differences. To do so, some Shiite and Sunni`s commentaries including Shiite commentaries Al-Tebyan, Noor al-Thaqalayn and Al-Mizan and Sunni`s Jami al-Bayan, Mafatih al-Ghaib, Ruh al-Ma'ani and Al-Munir have been studied with regard to the subject. It has been proved that Al-Mizan, taking the method of Quran to Quran commentary and using reasonable and theological proofs and traditions as supporter, has presented the solution best. |
|
Keywords: Comparative commentary, interpretative method, prophets` purity, dawood`s wrong |
|
Full-Text [PDF 5186 kb]
(545 Downloads)
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special Received: 2012/01/25 | Accepted: 2012/04/19 | Published: 2019/12/15
|
|
|
|