1- Buali Sina University , mjharaty@yahoo.com 2- Qom University
Abstract: (2061 Views)
Commentator`s interpretative methods is known as one origin for Shiite and Sunni difference in Quran commentaries. Commentators, when interpreting the verses 22-26 of chapter Suad, differ in conciliating prophet Dawood`s purity and wrong. Surveying Shiite and Sunni`s commentary methods comparatively, the paper has intended to study the origins of commentator`s differences. To do so, some Shiite and Sunni`s commentaries including Shiite commentaries Al-Tebyan, Noor al-Thaqalayn and Al-Mizan and Sunni`s Jami al-Bayan, Mafatih al-Ghaib, Ruh al-Ma'ani and Al-Munir have been studied with regard to the subject. It has been proved that Al-Mizan, taking the method of Quran to Quran commentary and using reasonable and theological proofs and traditions as supporter, has presented the solution best.
Harati M, Moaddab S R. A comparative study of interpretative methods in conciliating purity and wrong of the prophet Dawood. مطالعات تفسیری 2012; 3 (9) :57-80 URL: http://tafsir.maaref.ac.ir/article-1-1605-en.html