The present descriptive-analytic research has examined and interpreted the commentators' view on the why of not mentioning Uli `lamr as a source of conflict resolution in the verse 59 of Sura Nisa. In various respects, some have considered lack of innocence as the reason for not mentioning them as a source of dispute resolution, some view the people`s obligation in following the first part of the verse as the why, some believe that as Uli `lamr themselves are known to be obliged to follow the book and Sunnah, they may not be taken as the source of conflict solution and, finally, some have known Uli `lamr `s lack of the right for divine legislation, they have not been mentioned as the source for conflict solution. From the in-text and out-of-text analysis of the verse, it is clear that what has been cited as the why for not mentioning them as the source of conflict solution is contrary to what we perceive from the appearance of the verse. An again, as Uli `lamr themselves may be a part in a conflict, they may not be taken as a source for conflict solution.